@article {urbaniak2010response,
	title = {Response to a Critic (Definability and Ontology)},
	journal = {Reports on Mathematical Logic},
	volume = {45},
	year = {2010},
	pages = {255-259},
	author = {Urbaniak, Rafal}
}
@incollection {Urbaniak2008,
	title = {Reasoning with dynamic conceptual frames.},
	booktitle = {Logic, Philosophy and History of Science in Belgium. Proceedings of the Young Researchers Days 2008},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {84-89},
	publisher = {Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van Belgi{\"e}},
	address = {Brussel},
	author = {Urbaniak, Rafal},
	editor = {Weber, Erik and Libert, Thierry and Marage, Pierre and Vanpaemel, Geert}
}
@incollection {Urbaniak2008a,
	title = {Reducing sets to modalities},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 31st International Wittgenstein Symposium of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society},
	volume = {XVI},
	year = {2008},
	pages = {359-361},
	publisher = {Department for Culture and Science of the Province of Lower Austria},
	address = {Kirchberg am wechsel},
	author = {Urbaniak, Rafal},
	editor = {Hieke, Alexander and Hannes, Leitgeb}
}
@article {Urbaniak2006,
	title = {On representing 2<n-place connectives of Protothetic},
	journal = {Journal of Logic and Computation},
	volume = {16},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {451-460},
	abstract = {<p>After a brief presentation of Lesniewski{\textquoteright}s notation for 1- and 2-place sentential connectives of protothetic, the article discusses a method of extending this method to <em>n</em> \&amp;\#8805; 3-place sentential connectives. Such a method has been hinted at by Luschei, but in fact, no general effective method of defining such functors has been clearly and explicitly given. The purpose of this article is to provide such a method.</p>},
	author = {Urbaniak, Rafal}
}
