@article {287734,
	title = {Non-spatiality and EPR-experiments according to the creation-discovery view},
	journal = {Foundations of Physics Letters},
	volume = {16},
	number = {4},
	year = {2003},
	month = {August},
	pages = {379{\textendash}387},
	abstract = {<p>The creation-discovery interpretation of the EPR-experiments, developed by D. Aerts, draws our attention on the role of spacetime in our description of the physical world: the EPR-experiments give us reason to believe that quantum entities do not always exist in space. This interpretation of the quantum description would explain the peculiar correlations obtained in these experiments as arising from the most obvious candidate for a common cause, the entity described by the singlet state. The absence of unique and determinate localization as a criterium for individuation is met by a new physical ontology. We use it to obtain a better understanding of the interaction between quantum individuals and spacetime.</p>},
	issn = {0894-9875},
	doi = {10.1023/A:1025317910387},
	author = {Christiaens, Wim}
}
@article {christiaens2003note,
	title = {A note concerning the place of contradictions in the ontologies of constitution},
	journal = {Logic and Logical Philosophy},
	volume = {11/12},
	year = {2003},
	pages = {67{\textendash}72},
	abstract = {<p>In this first section we start with defining the notions of inconsistency and para-consistency, we give an example of an inconsistency and clarify what according to us is the basic problem with respect to the occurrence of inconsistencies. We are then in a position to state the aim of this paper</p>},
	author = {Christiaens, Wim}
}
