@article {JMFC:iadl,
	title = {Non-Adjunctive Deontic Logics That Validate Aggregation as Much as Possible},
	journal = {Journal of Applied Logic},
	year = {In Press},
	author = {Meheus, Joke and Beirlaen, Mathieu and Van De Putte, Frederik and Stra{\ss}er, Christian}
}
@article {beirlaen2013non,
	title = {Non-monotonic reasoning with normative conflicts in multi-agent deontic logic},
	journal = {Journal of Logic and Computation},
	volume = {24},
	number = {6},
	year = {2013},
	pages = {1179{\textendash}1207},
	abstract = {<p>We present two multi-agent deontic logics that consistently accommodate various types of normative conflicts. Its language features modal operators for obligation and permission, and for the realization of individual and collective actions. The logic is non-classical since it makes use of a paraconsistent and paracomplete negation connective. Moreover, it is non-monotonic due to its definition within the adaptive logics framework for defeasible reasoning. The logic is equipped with a defeasible proof theory and semantics.</p>},
	doi = {10.1093/logcom/exs059},
	author = {Beirlaen, Mathieu and Stra{\ss}er, Christian}
}
@proceedings {2973606,
	title = {An {A}ndersonian deontic logic with contextualized sanctions},
	journal = {11th International Conference on Deontic Logic in Computer Science, DEON2012},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {151-169},
	publisher = {Springer},
	abstract = {<p>We present a refinement of Anderson{\textquoteright}s reduction of deontic logic to modal logic with only alethic modalities. The refined proposal contextualizes the Andersonian sanction constant s by replacing it with a unary sanction operator S that is dependent on the concrete normative requirement that is violated. A formula S B is then for instance interpreted as ldquo B causes a sanctionrdquo or as ldquo B provides a reason for (the applicability of) a sanctionrdquo. Due to its modified sanction operator, the resulting logic DSL invalidates some instances of the inheritance principle. This gives rise to new interesting features. For instance, DSL consistently allows for the presence of conflicting obligations. Moreover, it provides novel insights in various central {\textquoteleft}paradoxes{\textquoteright} in deontic logic such as the Ross paradox, the paradox of the good Samaritan, and Forrester{\textquoteright}s {\textquoteleft}gentle murderer{\textquoteright} paradox.</p>},
	isbn = {9783642315695},
	author = {Stra{\ss}er, Christian and Beirlaen, Mathieu},
	editor = {Agotnes, Thomas and Broersen, Jan and Elgesem, Dag}
}
