@book {371040,
	title = {Wetenschapsfilosofie.},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {238 p.},
	publisher = {Koninklijke Van Gorcum},
	organization = {Koninklijke Van Gorcum},
	isbn = {978-90-232-4312-0},
	author = {Horsten, Leon and Douven, Igor and Weber, Erik}
}
@article {371043,
	title = {Wie rookt gaat sneller dood en betaalt dus meer: {O}ver het belang van oorzaak-gevolg-relaties in verzekeren en de moeilijkheid bij het onderzoeken ervan},
	journal = {Ethiek en Maatschappij},
	volume = {8},
	number = {3},
	year = {2005},
	pages = {58{\textendash}69},
	abstract = {<p>Smokers die sooner and therefore pay more. On the importance of cause-effect- relations in insurance and the difficulties researching them. For insurers, a correct knowledge of causes are important. An insurance companies who failes to adequatly assess the causes of particular risks will loose its market position due to wrong price setting. In this paper, I discuss possible methods determine the causes of risks, as well as problems and imperfections of those methods.</p>},
	issn = {1373-0975},
	author = {Weber, Erik}
}
@incollection {152663,
	title = {Why the logic of explanation is inconsistency-adaptive.},
	booktitle = {Inconsistency in science},
	year = {2002},
	pages = {165{\textendash}184},
	publisher = {Kluwer},
	isbn = {1-4020-0630-6},
	doi = {10.1007/978-94-017-0085-6_10},
	author = {Weber, Erik and De Clercq, Kristof},
	editor = {Meheus, Joke}
}
@article {109728,
	title = {World Models and Inconsistencies.},
	journal = {Foundations of Science},
	volume = {3},
	year = {1999},
	pages = {285{\textendash}311},
	abstract = {<p>A worldview has sic components. We concentrate on the first two: descriptive world model and the explanatory world model. In the first half of the paper we make some general remarks on the methodology of world construction. In the second part, we discuss inconsistencies in world models. Adding new fragments to our world model can lead to inconsistencies Three strategies are distinguished: (i) a partial return to instrumentalism, (ii) paraconsistency, and (iii) the adaptive option. The latter option is elaborated by means of several historical examples and by means of the EPR paradox.</p>},
	issn = {1233-1821},
	author = {Weber, Erik and Christiaens, Wim}
}
@incollection {241638,
	title = {Waarom {W}esley {S}almons causaal-mechanische model van verklaring niet volstaat},
	booktitle = {Iedereen die niet denkt zoals ik, volge mij. {A}cta 16de {N}ederlands-{V}laamse Filosofiedag},
	year = {1994},
	pages = {81-86},
	publisher = {VUB Press},
	isbn = {9789054870845},
	author = {Weber, Erik},
	editor = {Van Bendegem, Jean Paul and Cornelis, Gustaaf C}
}
@incollection {241636,
	title = {Wetenschappelijke verklaringen en subjectief verwacht nut},
	booktitle = {Actueel Filosoferen},
	year = {1993},
	pages = {53-60},
	publisher = {Eburon},
	address = {Delft},
	author = {Weber, Erik},
	editor = {van Dooren, Wim and Hoff, Tineke}
}
