@article {J:AJ,
	title = {An Adaptive Logic Based on {J}a{\'s}kowski{\textquoteright}s Approach to Paraconsistency},
	journal = {Journal of Philosophical Logic},
	volume = {35},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {539{\textendash}567},
	abstract = {<p>In this paper, I present the modal adaptive logic AJ <sup>r</sup> (based on <strong>S5</strong>) as well as the discussive logic D<sup>r</sup>2 that is defined from it. D<sup>r</sup><sub>2</sub> is a (non-monotonic) alternative for Jaskowskis paraconsistent system D 2 . Like D 2 , D<sup>r</sup><sub>2</sub> validates all single-premise rules of Classical Logic. However, for formulas that behave consistently, D<sub>2</sub> moreover validates all multiple-premise rules of Classical Logic. Importantly, and unlike in the case of D<sub>2</sub> , this does not require the introduction of discussive connectives. It is argued that this has clear advantages with respect to one of the main application contexts of discussive logics, namely the interpretation of discussions.</p>},
	author = {Meheus, Joke}
}
