@article {524788,
	title = {Graham Allisons modellen voor de analyse van internationale betrekkingen: een pluralistische kritiek},
	journal = {Ethiek \& Maatschappij},
	volume = {8},
	number = {2},
	year = {2005},
	pages = {64{\textendash}77},
	abstract = {<p>A call for epistemic pluralism is credible only when showing enough pluralism itself. Graham Allisons three conceptual models made such a call, but do his models differ enough? Based on a fundamental theoretical analysis, disentangling the ontological and methodological aspects of Allisons models, I conclude they do not. Subsequently, arguing that additional diversity is necessary and not an impossible endeavour, I construct a fourth model based on Alexander Wendts Social Theory of International Politics. This model is fundamentally different from Allisons models, and in combination with them a more convincing case for epistemic pluralism.</p>},
	issn = {1373-0975},
	author = {De Langhe, Rogier}
}
