@article {MCJ:iadlnc,
	title = {An Inconsistency-Adaptive Deontic Logic for Normative Conflicts},
	journal = {Journal of Philosophical Logic},
	volume = {42},
	number = {2},
	year = {2013},
	pages = {285{\textendash}315},
	abstract = {<p>We present the inconsistency-adaptive deontic logic \sys{DP}$^r$, a nonmonotonic logic for dealing with conflicts between normative statements. On the one hand, this logic does not lead to explosion in view of normative conflicts. On the other hand, \sys{DP}$^r$ still verifies all intuitively reliable inferences valid in Standard Deontic Logic (\sys{SDL}). \sys{DP}$^r$ interprets a given premise set as normally as possible with respect to \sys{SDL}. Whereas some \sys{SDL}-rules are verified unconditionally by \sys{DP}$^r$, others are verified conditionally. The latter are applicable unless they rely on formulas that turn out to behave inconsistently in view of the premises. This dynamic process is mirrored by the proof theory of \sys{DP}$^r$</p>},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10992-011-9221-3},
	author = {Beirlaen, Mathieu and Stra{\ss}er, Christian and Meheus, Joke}
}
