@conference {JMF:adera,
	title = {Avoiding Deontic Explosion by Contextually Restricting Aggregation},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Deontic Logic in Computer Science (DEON 2010)},
	year = {2010},
	publisher = {Springer},
	organization = {Springer},
	address = {Dordrecht},
	abstract = {<p>In this paper, we present an adaptive logic for deontic conflicts, called \sys{P2.1}$^r$, that is based on Goble{\textquoteright}s logic \sys{SDL}$a$\sys{P}$e${\textendash}-a bimodal extension of Goble{\textquoteright}s logic \sys{P} that invalidates aggregation for all \emph{prima facie} obligations. The logic \sys{P2.1}$^r$ has several advantages with respect to \sys{SDL}$a$\sys{P}$e$. For consistent sets of obligations it yields the same results as Standard Deontic Logic and for inconsistent sets of obligations, it validates aggregation {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}as much as possible{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright}. It thus leads to a richer consequence set than \sys{SDL}$a$\sys{P}$e$. The logic \sys{P2.1}$^r$ avoids Goble{\textquoteright}s criticisms against other non-adjunctive systems of deontic logic. Moreover, it can handle all the {\textquoteleft}toy examples{\textquoteright} from the literature as well as more complex ones.</p>},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14183-6\_12},
	author = {Meheus, Joke and Beirlaen, Mathieu and Van De Putte, Frederik},
	editor = {Governatori, Guido and Sartor, Giovanni}
}
