De Langhe, Rogier. 2009. “Trading Off Explanatory Virtues”. In Logic, Philosophy and History of Science in Belgium. Proceedings of the Young Researchers Days, Logic, Philosophy and History of Science in Belgium. Proceedings of the Young Researchers Days, Erik Weber, Libert, Thierry, Marage, Pierre, and Van Paemel, Geert. {Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van België.

Weber, Erik. 1987. “The Transformation Of Cognitive Values Into Methodological Rules”. Philosophica 40: 151–164.

Batens, Diderik, Christian Straßer, and Peter Verdée. 2009. “On The Transparency Of Defeasible Logics: Equivalent Premise Sets, Equivalence Of Their Extensions, And Maximality Of The Lower Limit”. Logique et Analyse 207: 281–304.

Pawlowski, Pawel. Submitted. “Tree-Like Proof Systems For Finitely-Many Valued Deterministic And Indeterministic Consequence Relations”.

Batens, Diderik. 2015. “Tutorial On Inconsistency-Adaptive Logics” Jean-Yves Béziau, Chakraborty, Mihir, and Dutta, Soma. New Directions in Paraconsistent Logic.

Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. 1997. “Twee Grote Verhalen Over Wetenschap (Voor Allen En Voor Niemand).” Jan Vandormael. Ik & het verhaal: 107-130.

Beirlaen, Mathieu, and Christian Straßer. 2013. “Two Adaptive Logics Of Norm-Propositions”. JOURNAL OF APPLIED LOGIC 11: 147–168.

Weber, Erik. 2012. “Two Gaps In The Contextual Theory Of Scientific Understanding”. The Reasoner 6: 130-131.

Batens, Diderik. 2015. “Two, Many, And Differently Many” Arnold Koslow and Buchsbaum, Arthur. The Road to Universal Logic. Festschrift for the 50th Birthday of Jean-Yves Béziau II: 213–242.

De Clercq, Kristof. 2000. “Two New Strategies For Inconsistency-Adaptive Logics”. Logic and Logical Philosophy 8: 65–80.

Weber, Erik. 2012. “Two Problems For The Contextual Theory Of Scienitfic Understanding”. The Reasoner 6: 60–62.

Batens, Diderik. 1987. “Two Semantically Motivated Enrichments Of Relevant Logics” Jerzy Perzanowski. Essays in Philosophical Logic: 65–74.

Primiero, Giuseppe, and Bjørn Jespersen. 2009. “Two Type-Theoretical Approaches To Privative Modification” Kumiyo Nakakoji, Murakami, Yohei, and McCready, Eric. New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence: JSAI-isAI 2009 Workshops: 239–258.

Castel, Paul, and Diderik Batens. 1994. “The Two-Envelope Paradox: The Infinite Case”. Analysis 54: 46–49.

Primiero, Giuseppe. 2012. “Type-Theoretical Dynamics. Exploring Belief Revision In A Constructive Framework” Shahid Rahman, Primiero, Giuseppe, and Marion, Mathieu. The realism-antirealism debate in the age of alternative logics: 191–212.

Beirlaen, Mathieu. 2012. “Understanding Human Agency, By Erasmus Mayr (Review; In Dutch)”. Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 2: 383-385.

Ducheyne, Steffen. 2009. “Understanding (In) Newton's Argument For Universal Gravitation”. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 40: 227-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10838-009-9096-y.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2009. “Understanding In Political Science: The Plurality Of Epistemic Interests” Henk De Regt, Leonelli, Sabina, and Eigner, Kai. Scientific Understanding. Philosophical Perspectives: 298–313.

Weber, Erik, and Maarten Van Dyck. 2002. “Unification And Explanation - A Comment On Halonen And Hintikka, And Schurz.”. Synthese 131: 145–154.

Weber, Erik. 1999. “Unification: What Is It, How Do We Reach And Why Do We Want It?”. Synthese 118: 479–499.

De Langhe, Rogier. 2014. “A Unified Model Of The Division Of Cognitive Labor.”. Philosophy of Science 81: 444–459.

Beirlaen, Mathieu. 2012. “A Unifying Framework For Reasoning About Normative Conflicts” Michal Pelis and Puncochar, Vit. The logica yearbook 2011: 1–14.

Batens, Diderik. 2007. “A Universal Logic Approach To Adaptive Logics”. Logica Universalis 1: 221-242.

Batens, Diderik. 2001. “A Universally Abnormality-Adaptive Logic”. Logical Investigations 8: 256–265.

Froeyman, Anton, and Leen De Vreese. 2008. “Unravelling The Methodology Of Causal Pluralism”. Philosophica 81: 73–89.