@incollection {2020,
	title = {Adaptive Deontic Logics},
	booktitle = {Handbook of Deontic Logic and Normative Systems},
	volume = {2},
	year = {In Press},
	publisher = {College Publications},
	edition = {1},
	author = {Van De Putte, Frederik and Beirlaen, Mathieu and Meheus, Joke}
}
@article {2068,
	title = {Adaptive Deontic Logics: A Survey},
	journal = {IfCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications},
	volume = {6},
	number = {3},
	year = {2019},
	pages = {523-608},
	chapter = {523},
	url = {http://www.collegepublications.co.uk/downloads/ifcolog00032.pdf},
	author = {Van De Putte, Frederik and Beirlaen, Mathieu and Meheus, Joke}
}
@article {strasser2014dynamic,
	title = {Adaptive Logic Characterizations of Input/output Logic},
	journal = {Studia Logica},
	volume = {104},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {869-916},
	chapter = {869},
	abstract = {<p>We translate the unconstrained and constrained input/output-logics from [17, 18] to reflexive modal logics, using adaptive logics for the constrained case. The resulting reformulation has various advantages. First, we obtain a proof-theoretic (dynamic) characterization of input/output logics. Second, we demonstrate that our modal framework gives naturally rise to useful variants. Finally, the modal logics display a gain in expressive power over their original counterparts in the input/output framework.</p>},
	author = {Stra{\ss}er, Christian and Beirlaen, Mathieu and Van De Putte, Frederik}
}
@article {Beirlaen2011,
	title = {Aristotle{\textquoteright}s Modal Proofs, by {A}driane {R}ini (review; in Dutch)},
	journal = {Tijdschrift voor Filosofie},
	volume = {4},
	number = {73},
	year = {2011},
	pages = {749-751},
	author = {Beirlaen, Mathieu}
}
@conference {JMF:adera,
	title = {Avoiding Deontic Explosion by Contextually Restricting Aggregation},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Deontic Logic in Computer Science (DEON 2010)},
	year = {2010},
	publisher = {Springer},
	organization = {Springer},
	address = {Dordrecht},
	abstract = {<p>In this paper, we present an adaptive logic for deontic conflicts, called \sys{P2.1}$^r$, that is based on Goble{\textquoteright}s logic \sys{SDL}$a$\sys{P}$e${\textendash}-a bimodal extension of Goble{\textquoteright}s logic \sys{P} that invalidates aggregation for all \emph{prima facie} obligations. The logic \sys{P2.1}$^r$ has several advantages with respect to \sys{SDL}$a$\sys{P}$e$. For consistent sets of obligations it yields the same results as Standard Deontic Logic and for inconsistent sets of obligations, it validates aggregation {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}as much as possible{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright}. It thus leads to a richer consequence set than \sys{SDL}$a$\sys{P}$e$. The logic \sys{P2.1}$^r$ avoids Goble{\textquoteright}s criticisms against other non-adjunctive systems of deontic logic. Moreover, it can handle all the {\textquoteleft}toy examples{\textquoteright} from the literature as well as more complex ones.</p>},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14183-6\_12},
	author = {Meheus, Joke and Beirlaen, Mathieu and Van De Putte, Frederik},
	editor = {Governatori, Guido and Sartor, Giovanni}
}
